{"id":626,"date":"2022-09-08T05:29:33","date_gmt":"2022-09-08T05:29:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/?page_id=626"},"modified":"2025-06-27T16:28:54","modified_gmt":"2025-06-27T13:28:54","slug":"candidati","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/?page_id=626&lang=en","title":{"rendered":"Candidates"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/p>\n

[vc_row content_placement=”middle” wrap_container=”yes” conditional_render=”%5B%7B%22value_role%22%3A%22administrator%22%7D%5D”][vc_column][vc_empty_space][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column width=”1\/6″][\/vc_column][vc_column width=”2\/3″ text_align=”center” conditional_render=”%5B%7B%22value_role%22%3A%22administrator%22%7D%5D”][vc_accordion active_tab=”false” collapsible=”yes”][vc_accordion_tab title=”SCM Candidates \/ Judges”][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
Nr.<\/strong><\/div>\n
ord.<\/b><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
Surname, Name<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
Place of\u00a0<\/strong>employment<\/b><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
Decision of the Pre-Vetting Commission<\/strong><\/td>\n\n
\u00a0Evaluation\u00a0<\/strong>result<\/b><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\u00a0SCJ\u00a0<\/strong>Decision<\/b><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
Resumed evaluation result<\/strong><\/td>\nSCJ Decision on the resumed evaluation<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
1.<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
BALAN Gheorghe<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
Chi\u0219in\u0103u Court,<\/div>\n
Botanica Office<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
Decision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nFail<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/td>\n—<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
2.<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
BEJENARU Iurie<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
Supreme Court of Justice<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
Decision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nFail<\/span><\/td>\nDecision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\n—<\/td>\n—<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
3.<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
BU\u0218ULEAC Mihail<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
Cahul Court,<\/div>\n
Head Office<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
Refused to publish the decision<\/td>\nFail<\/span><\/td>\nDecision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\n\n

Withdrew from the competition<\/span><\/p>\n

Refused to publish the decision<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

—<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
4.<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
BOSTAN Angela<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
Chi\u0219in\u0103u Court of Appeal<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
Decision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nFail<\/span><\/td>\nDecision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\n\u00a0Fail<\/span><\/a><\/td>\nUpheld the Commission’s decision (RO)<\/a><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
5.<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
BUZU Ecaterina<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
Orhei Court,<\/div>\n
Head Office<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
Decision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nFail<\/span><\/td>\nDecision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\n Fail<\/span><\/a><\/td>\nOr<\/span><\/a>dered reevaluation (RO)<\/a><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
6.<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
CARAMAN Sergiu<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
Criuleni Court<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
Decision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nPass<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/td>\n—<\/td>\n—<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
7.<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
CHIRTOACA Ion<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n

Chi\u0219in\u0103u Court,<\/p>\n

Buiucani Office<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Decision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nFail<\/span><\/td>\nDecision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nFail<\/span><\/a><\/td>\nPassed the candidate (RO)<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
8.<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
COJOCARU Mihail<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n

B\u0103l\u021bi Court,<\/p>\n

Head Office<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Decision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nFail<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/td>\n—<\/td>\n—<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
9.<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
COTRU\u021a\u0102 Iurie<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
Chi\u0219in\u0103u Court of Appeal<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
Refused to publish the decision<\/td>\nFail<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/td>\n—<\/td>\n—<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
10.<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
CUPCEA Veronica<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n

Orhei Court,<\/p>\n

Head Office<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Decision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nFail<\/span><\/td>\nDecision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nFail<\/span><\/a><\/td>\nPending\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
11.<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
CHIRONE\u021a Ioana<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n

Chi\u0219in\u0103u Court,<\/p>\n

Ciocana Office<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Decision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nPass<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/td>\n—<\/td>\n—<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
12.<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
CLEVAD\u00ce Natalia<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n

Chi\u0219in\u0103u Court,<\/p>\n

Buiucani Office<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Decision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nFail<\/span><\/td>\nDecision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\n—<\/td>\n—<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
13.<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
FRUNZE Maria<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n

Chi\u0219in\u0103u Court,<\/p>\n

Centru Office<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Decision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nPass<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/td>\n—<\/td>\n—<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
14.<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
HOLBAN Vladislav<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n

Chi\u0219in\u0103u Court,<\/p>\n

Centru Office<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Refused to publish the decision<\/td>\nFail<\/span><\/td>\nDecision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\n\n

Fail<\/span><\/p>\n

Refused to publish the decision<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Upheld the Commission’s decision (RO)<\/span><\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
15.<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
MITROFAN Livia<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n

Chi\u0219in\u0103u Court,<\/p>\n

Centru Office<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Decision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nPass<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/td>\n—<\/td>\n—<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
16.<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
MIRON Aliona<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
Supreme Court of Justice<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
Decision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nFail<\/span><\/td>\nDecision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nPass<\/span><\/a><\/td>\n—<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
17.<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
OSOIANU Sergiu<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
Str\u0103\u0219eni Court<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
Refused to publish the decision<\/td>\nFail<\/span><\/td>\nDecision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\n\n

Fail<\/span><\/p>\n

Refused to publish the decision<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Upheld the Commission’s decision (RO)<\/span><\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
18.<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
PU\u0218CA Dumitru<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
B\u0103l\u021bi Court of Appeal<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
Decision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nFail<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/td>\n—<\/td>\n—<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
19.<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
PANI\u0218 Alexei<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n

Chi\u0219in\u0103u Court,<\/p>\n

R\u00ee\u0219cani Office<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Decision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nFail<\/span><\/td>\nDecision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nFail<\/span><\/a><\/td>\nUpheld the Commission’s decision (RO)<\/a><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
20.<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
POSTIC\u0102 Aureliu<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n

Chi\u0219in\u0103u Court,<\/p>\n

Buiucani Office<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Refused to publish the decision<\/td>\nFail<\/span><\/td>\nDecision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nFail<\/span><\/a><\/td>\nUpheld the Commission’s decision (RO)<\/a><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
21.<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
RUSU Marina<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
Cahul Court,<\/div>\n
Taraclia Office<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
Decision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nFail<\/span><\/td>\nDecision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\n\n

Fail<\/span><\/p>\n

Refused to publish the decision<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Pending\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
22.<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
SORBALO Stanislav<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
B\u0103l\u021bi Court,<\/div>\n
Head Office<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
Decision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nFail<\/span><\/td>\nDecision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nEvaluation terminated\u00a0<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nUpheld the Commission’s decision (RO)<\/a><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
23.<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
STRATAN Vitalie<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n

Chi\u0219in\u0103u Court,<\/p>\n

Head Office<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Refused to publish the decision<\/td>\nFail<\/span><\/td>\nDecision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\n\n

Fail<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Refused to publish the decision<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Upheld the Commission’s decision (RO)<\/a><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
24.<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
SANDU Victor<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n

Chi\u0219in\u0103u Court,<\/p>\n

Centru Office<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Refused to publish the decision<\/td>\nFail<\/span><\/td>\nDecision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nFail<\/span><\/td>\n Pending\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
25.<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\u0218CHIOPU Vasile<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
Ungheni Court<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
Decision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nPass<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/td>\n—<\/td>\n—<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
26.<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\u0218OVA Nicolae<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n

Chi\u0219in\u0103u Court,<\/p>\n

Centru Office<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Refused to publish the decision<\/td>\nFail<\/span><\/td>\nDecision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nFail<\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/td>\nUpheld the Commission’s decision (RO)<\/a><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
27.<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
TALMACI Iana<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
Str\u0103\u0219eni Court<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
Decision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nFail<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/td>\n—<\/td>\n—<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
28.<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\u021aURCAN Anatolie<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
Supreme Court of Justice<\/div>\n<\/td>\n
Refused to publish the decision<\/td>\nFail<\/span><\/td>\nDecision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\n—<\/td>\n—<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_accordion_tab][vc_accordion_tab title=”SCM Candidates \/ Non-judges”][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
Nr.<\/strong><\/div>\n
ord.<\/b><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
Surname, Name<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
Place of\u00a0<\/strong>employment<\/b><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
Decision of the Pre-Vetting Commission<\/strong><\/td>\n\n
\u00a0Evaluation\u00a0<\/strong>result<\/b><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\u00a0SCJ\u00a0<\/strong>Decision<\/b><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
Resumed evaluation result<\/strong><\/td>\nSCJ Decision on the resumed evaluation<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
1.<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
AGACHI Nicolae<\/td>\n\n

Professional experience in law<\/p>\n

or another relevant field<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Refused to publish the decision<\/td>\nFail<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n —<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
2.<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
BELECCIU \u0218tefan<\/td>\n\n

Professional experience in law<\/p>\n

or another relevant field<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Refused to publish the decision<\/td>\nFail<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n—\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
3.<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
BRIA Feodor<\/td>\n\n

Professional experience in law<\/p>\n

or another relevant field<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Decision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nFail<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n—\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
4.<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
CAIS\u00ceN Valentin<\/td>\n\n

Professional experience in law<\/p>\n

or another relevant field<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Decision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nFail<\/span><\/td>\nDecision<\/span><\/a><\/td>\nWithdrew from the competition\u00a0<\/a><\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
5.<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
CHIRIAC Tatiana<\/td>\n\n

Professional experience in law<\/p>\n

or another relevant field<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Decision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nFail<\/span><\/td>\nDecision<\/span><\/a><\/td>\nFail\u00a0<\/span><\/a><\/td>\nUpheld the Commission’s Decision (RO)<\/a><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
6.<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
CHIRTOAC\u0102 Leonid<\/td>\n\n

Professional experience in law<\/p>\n

or another relevant field<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Decision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nPass<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
7.<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
CIAGLIC Tatiana<\/td>\n\n

Professional experience in law<\/p>\n

or another relevant field<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Decision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nPass<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
8.<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
CORCENCO Aliona<\/td>\n\n

Professional experience in law<\/p>\n

or another relevant field<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Refused to publish the decision<\/td>\nPass<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/span><\/td>\n —<\/span><\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
9.<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
FLOREA Eugen<\/td>\n\n

Professional experience in law<\/p>\n

or another relevant field<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Decision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nFail<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n—\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
10.<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
GUZUN Ion<\/td>\n\n

Professional experience in law<\/p>\n

or another relevant field<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Decision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nPass<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
11.<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
GU\u021aAN Veaceslav<\/td>\n\n

Professional experience in law<\/p>\n

or another relevant field<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Decision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nPass<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
12.<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
M\u0102M\u0102LIG\u0102 Ilie<\/td>\n\n

Professional experience in law<\/p>\n

or another relevant field<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Decision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nFail<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n—\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
13.<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
MUNTEAN Iulian<\/td>\n\n

Professional experience in law<\/p>\n

or another relevant field<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Decision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nPass<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
14.<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
OU\u0218 Ludmila<\/td>\n\n

Professional experience in law<\/p>\n

or another relevant field<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Decision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nFail<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n—\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
15.<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
POSTICA Alexandru<\/td>\n\n

Professional experience in law<\/p>\n

or another relevant field<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Decision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nPass<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n—\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
16.<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
POPESCU Lucia<\/td>\n\n

Professional experience in law<\/p>\n

or another relevant field<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Decision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nPass<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n—\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
17.<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
POPIL Angela<\/td>\n\n

Professional experience in law<\/p>\n

or another relevant field<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Decision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nFail<\/span><\/td>\nDecision<\/span><\/a><\/td>\nWithdrew from the competition<\/a>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
18.<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
JEREGHI Vanu<\/td>\n\n

Professional experience in law<\/p>\n

or another relevant field<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Decision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nFail<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n—\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
19.<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
S\u00ceLI Vitalie<\/td>\n\n

Professional experience in law<\/p>\n

or another relevant field<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Decision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nPass<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n—\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
20.<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
ROTARI Alexandru<\/td>\n\n

Professional experience in law<\/p>\n

or another relevant field<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Refused to publish the decision<\/td>\nFail<\/span><\/td>\nDecision<\/span><\/a><\/td>\n\n

Fail<\/span><\/p>\n

Refused to publish the decision<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Upheld the Commission’s Decision (RO)<\/a><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
21.<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
TIPA Ana<\/td>\n\n

Professional experience in law<\/p>\n

or another relevant field<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Decision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nFail<\/span><\/td>\nDecision<\/span><\/a><\/td>\n—\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_accordion_tab][vc_accordion_tab title=”SCP candidates \/ Prosecutors\/non-prosecutors”][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n
Nr.<\/strong><\/div>\n
ord.<\/b><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
Surname, Name<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
Place of\u00a0<\/strong>employment<\/b><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
Decision of the Pre-Vetting Commission<\/strong><\/td>\n\n
\u00a0Evaluation\u00a0<\/strong>result<\/b><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
\n
\u00a0SCJ\u00a0<\/strong>Decision<\/b><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
Resumed evaluation result<\/strong><\/td>\nSCJ Decision on the resumed evaluation<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
1.<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n
BOR\u0218 Gheorghe<\/td>\nGeneral Prosecutor’s Office<\/td>\nRefused to publish the decision<\/td>\nFail<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n—\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2.<\/td>\nBUZDUGAN Aurelian<\/td>\nAnenii Noi Prosecutor’s Office<\/td>\nDecision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nFail<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n—\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3.<\/td>\nCHERPEC Mariana<\/td>\nChi\u0219in\u0103u Prosecutor’s Office<\/td>\nDecision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nPass<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n—\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4.<\/td>\nCIOBANU Rodica<\/td>\nAcademy of Sciences of Moldova<\/td>\nDecision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nPass<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n—\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
5.<\/td>\nCODREANU Vitalie<\/td>\nAnticorruption Prosecutor’s Office<\/td>\nRefused to publish the decision<\/td>\nFail<\/span><\/td>\nDecision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\n\n

 <\/p>\n

Fail<\/span><\/p>\n

Refused to publish the decision<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Upheld the Commission’s Decision (RO)<\/a><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
6.<\/td>\nGLADCOV\u00a0 Cristina<\/td>\nAnticorruption Prosecutor’s Office<\/td>\nRefused to publish the decision<\/td>\nFail<\/span><\/td>\nDecision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\n\n

\u00a0Fail<\/span><\/p>\n

Refused to publish the decision<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Upheld the Commission’s Decision (RO)<\/a><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
7.<\/td>\nGRAUR\u00a0 Gheorghe<\/td>\nChi\u0219in\u0103u Prosecutor’s Office<\/td>\nRefused to publish the decision<\/td>\nFail<\/span><\/td>\nDecision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\n \u00a0—<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
8.<\/td>\nG\u00ceRBU Anatolie<\/td>\nUngheni Prosecutor’s Office<\/td>\nRefused to publish the decision<\/td>\nFail<\/span><\/td>\nDecision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\n\n

Fail\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Refused to publish the decision<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Upheld the Commission’s Decision (RO)<\/a><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
9.<\/td>\nLEALIN\u00a0 Iuri<\/td>\nGeneral Prosecutor’s Office<\/td>\nDecision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nPass<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n—\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
10.<\/td>\nMOROZ Remus<\/td>\n\u00a0Chi\u0219in\u0103u Prosecutor’s Office<\/td>\nDecision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nFail<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n—\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
11.<\/td>\nNESTEROV Aliona<\/td>\nGeneral Prosecutor’s Office<\/td>\nDecision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nPass<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n—\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
12.<\/td>\nOBAD\u0102\u00a0 Dumitru<\/td>\nGeneral Prosecutor’s Office<\/td>\nDecision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nPass<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
13.<\/td>\nPANEA Eduard<\/td>\nLeova Prosecutor’s Office<\/td>\nDecision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nPass<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n —<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
14.<\/td>\nPLEVAN Vasile<\/td>\nAnticorruption Prosecutor’s Office<\/td>\nDecision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nFail<\/span><\/td>\nDecision<\/span><\/td>\n—\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
15.<\/td>\nRO\u0218IOR\u00a0 Elena<\/td>\nAnenii Noi\u00a0Prosecutor’s Office<\/td>\nDecision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nPass<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n—\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
16.<\/td>\nROBU Cristina<\/td>\n\u00a0Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office \u201eSouth\u201d<\/td>\nDecision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nFail<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n—\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
17.<\/td>\nSTOINOV\u00a0 Vasile<\/td>\nPCCOCS, South Office<\/td>\nDecision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nFail<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n—\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
18.<\/td>\nV\u00ceRLAN\u00a0 Olesea<\/td>\nIaloveni Prosecutor’s Office<\/td>\nDecision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nPass<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n—\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
19.<\/td>\nM\u00ceRZA Radu<\/td>\nExpert in justice<\/td>\nDecision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nFail<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n—\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
20.<\/td>\nSORBALA Mihail<\/td>\nUniversity lecturer, ULIM<\/td>\nDecision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\nPass<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n—\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n—<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_accordion_tab][\/vc_accordion][\/vc_column][vc_column width=”1\/6″][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text][\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]<\/p>\n

<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

[vc_row content_placement=”middle” wrap_container=”yes” conditional_render=”%5B%7B%22value_role%22%3A%22administrator%22%7D%5D”][vc_column][vc_empty_space][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column width=”1\/6″][\/vc_column][vc_column width=”2\/3″ text_align=”center” conditional_render=”%5B%7B%22value_role%22%3A%22administrator%22%7D%5D”][vc_accordion active_tab=”false” collapsible=”yes”][vc_accordion_tab title=”SCM Candidates \/ Judges”][vc_column_text] Nr. ord. Surname, Name Place of\u00a0employment Decision of the Pre-Vetting Commission \u00a0Evaluation\u00a0result \u00a0SCJ\u00a0Decision Resumed evaluation result SCJ Decision on the resumed evaluation 1. BALAN Gheorghe Chi\u0219in\u0103u Court, Botanica Office Decision Fail — — — 2. BEJENARU Iurie Supreme Court of Justice […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-626","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nCandidates - "Pre-Vetting" Commission<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/?page_id=626&lang=en\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Candidates - "Pre-Vetting" Commission\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"[vc_row content_placement=”middle” wrap_container=”yes” conditional_render=”%5B%7B%22value_role%22%3A%22administrator%22%7D%5D”][vc_column][vc_empty_space][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column width=”1\/6″][\/vc_column][vc_column width=”2\/3″ text_align=”center” conditional_render=”%5B%7B%22value_role%22%3A%22administrator%22%7D%5D”][vc_accordion active_tab=”false” collapsible=”yes”][vc_accordion_tab title=”SCM Candidates \/ Judges”][vc_column_text] Nr. ord. Surname, Name Place of\u00a0employment Decision of the Pre-Vetting Commission \u00a0Evaluation\u00a0result \u00a0SCJ\u00a0Decision Resumed evaluation result SCJ Decision on the resumed evaluation 1. BALAN Gheorghe Chi\u0219in\u0103u Court, Botanica Office Decision Fail — — — 2. BEJENARU Iurie Supreme Court of Justice […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/?page_id=626&lang=en\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\""Pre-Vetting" Commission\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ComisiaPreVetting\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-06-27T13:28:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/logo-primary.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"178\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"187\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/?page_id=626&lang=en\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/?page_id=626&lang=en\",\"name\":\"Candidates - "Pre-Vetting" Commission\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2022-09-08T05:29:33+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-06-27T13:28:54+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/?page_id=626&lang=en#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[[\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/?page_id=626&lang=en\"]]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/?page_id=626&lang=en#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/?lang=en\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Candida\u021bi\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en\",\"name\":\""Pre-Vetting" Commission\",\"description\":\"The independent commission for evaluating the integrity of candidates for the position of member in the self-administration bodies of judges and prosecutors\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en#organization\",\"name\":\""Pre-Vetting" Commission\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/logo-primary.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/logo-primary.png\",\"width\":178,\"height\":187,\"caption\":\""Pre-Vetting" Commission\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ComisiaPreVetting\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UC2EHBvtuq2H0EkeR38NCnKQ\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Candidates - "Pre-Vetting" Commission","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/?page_id=626&lang=en","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Candidates - "Pre-Vetting" Commission","og_description":"[vc_row content_placement=”middle” wrap_container=”yes” conditional_render=”%5B%7B%22value_role%22%3A%22administrator%22%7D%5D”][vc_column][vc_empty_space][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column width=”1\/6″][\/vc_column][vc_column width=”2\/3″ text_align=”center” conditional_render=”%5B%7B%22value_role%22%3A%22administrator%22%7D%5D”][vc_accordion active_tab=”false” collapsible=”yes”][vc_accordion_tab title=”SCM Candidates \/ Judges”][vc_column_text] Nr. ord. Surname, Name Place of\u00a0employment Decision of the Pre-Vetting Commission \u00a0Evaluation\u00a0result \u00a0SCJ\u00a0Decision Resumed evaluation result SCJ Decision on the resumed evaluation 1. BALAN Gheorghe Chi\u0219in\u0103u Court, Botanica Office Decision Fail — — — 2. BEJENARU Iurie Supreme Court of Justice […]","og_url":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/?page_id=626&lang=en","og_site_name":""Pre-Vetting" Commission","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ComisiaPreVetting","article_modified_time":"2025-06-27T13:28:54+00:00","og_image":[{"width":178,"height":187,"url":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/logo-primary.png","type":"image\/png"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/?page_id=626&lang=en","url":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/?page_id=626&lang=en","name":"Candidates - "Pre-Vetting" Commission","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en#website"},"datePublished":"2022-09-08T05:29:33+00:00","dateModified":"2025-06-27T13:28:54+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/?page_id=626&lang=en#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":[["https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/?page_id=626&lang=en"]]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/?page_id=626&lang=en#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/?lang=en"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Candida\u021bi"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en#website","url":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en","name":""Pre-Vetting" Commission","description":"The independent commission for evaluating the integrity of candidates for the position of member in the self-administration bodies of judges and prosecutors","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en#organization","name":""Pre-Vetting" Commission","url":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/logo-primary.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/logo-primary.png","width":178,"height":187,"caption":""Pre-Vetting" Commission"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ComisiaPreVetting","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UC2EHBvtuq2H0EkeR38NCnKQ"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en%2Findex.php&rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/626","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en%2Findex.php&rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en%2Findex.php&rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en%2Findex.php&rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en%2Findex.php&rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=626"}],"version-history":[{"count":342,"href":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en%2Findex.php&rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/626\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4922,"href":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en%2Findex.php&rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/626\/revisions\/4922"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en%2Findex.php&rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=626"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}