{"id":3978,"date":"2023-12-15T16:19:52","date_gmt":"2023-12-15T14:19:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/?page_id=3978"},"modified":"2025-11-28T16:04:30","modified_gmt":"2025-11-28T14:04:30","slug":"decizii-evaluari-reluate","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/?page_id=3978&lang=en","title":{"rendered":"Decisions"},"content":{"rendered":"

[vc_row wrap_container=”yes” conditional_render=”%5B%7B%22value_role%22%3A%22administrator%22%7D%5D”][vc_column][vc_tabs position=”top-center” skin=”primary” type=”tabs-simple” icon_style=”featured-boxes-style-2″][vc_tab show_icon=”yes” title=”Decisions” tab_id=”a7ad52db-a6df-0″ icon=”fas fa-gavel”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 54 of 28 December 2023 on the candidacy of Mihail SORBALA, candidate for the Superior Council of Prosecutors<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator align=”align_left”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 1 of 25 September 2023 on the candidacy of Radu M\u00ceRZA, candidate to the Superior Council of Prosecutors<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator align=”align_left”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 52 of 21 August 2023 on the candidacy of Leonid CHIRTOAC\u0102, candidate for the Superior Council of Magistrates<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator align=”align_left”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 51 of 3 August 2023 on the candidacy of Lucia POPESCU, candidate for the Superior Council of Magistracy<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator align=”align_left”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 50 of 3 August 2023 on the candidacy of Iulian MUNTEAN, candidate for the Superior Council of Magistracy<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator align=”align_left”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 48 of 31 July 2023 on the candidacy of Vitalie SILI, candidate for the Superior Council of Magistracy<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator align=”align_left”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 47 of 31 July 2023 on the candidacy of Ana TIPA, candidate for the Superior Council of Magistracy<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator align=”align_left”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 46 of 31 July 2023 on the candidacy of Veaceslav GU\u021aAN, candidate for the Superior Council of Magistracy<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator align=”align_left”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 1 of 11 July 2023 on the candidacy of Vanu JEREGHI, candidate to the Superior Council of Magistracy<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator align=”align_left”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 44 of 4 July 2023 on the candidacy of Vasile PLEVAN candidate for the Superior Council of Prosecutors<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator align=”align_left”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 43 of 21June 2023 on the Candidacy of Eduard PANEA, candidate for the Superior Council of Prosecutors<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator align=”align_left”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 42 of 12 June 2023 on the Candidacy of Aliona NESTEROV, candidate for the Superior Council of Prosecutors<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator align=”align_left”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 41 of 9 June 2023 on the Candidacy of Elena RO\u0218IOR, candidate for the Superior Council of Prosecutors<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator align=”align_left”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 40 of 9 June 2023 on the Candidacy of Olesea V\u00ceRLAN , candidate for the Superior Council of Prosecutors<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator align=”align_left”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 39 of 9 June 2023 on the Candidacy of Iuri LEALIN, candidate for the Superior Council of Prosecutors<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator align=”align_left”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 38 of 8 June 2023 on the Candidacy of Mariana CHERPEC, candidate for the Superior Council of Prosecutors<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator align=”align_left”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 37 of 5 June 2023 on the candidacy of Rodica CIOBANU, candidate for the Superior Council of Prosecutors<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator align=”align_left”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 32 of 26 April 2023 on the candidacy of Dumitru OBAD\u0102, candidate for the Superior Council of Prosecutors<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator align=”align_left”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 2 of 20 April 2023 on the candidacy of Remus MOROZ, candidate to the Superior Council of Prosecutors<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator align=”align_left”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 1 of 20 April 2023 on the candidacy of Aurelian BUZDUGAN, candidate to the Superior Council of Prosecutors<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator align=”align_left”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 1 of 11 April 2023 on the candidacy of Cristina ROBU, candidate to the Superior Council of Prosecutors<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator align=”align_left”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 30 of 24 March 2023 on the candidacy of Tatiana CHIRIAC, candidate for the Superior Council of Magistracy<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator align=”align_left”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 28 of 21 March 2023 on the candidacy of Valentin CAIS\u00ceN, candidate for the Superior Council of Magistracy<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator align=”align_left”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 27 of 21 March 2023 on the candidacy of Angela POPIL, candidate for the Superior Council of Magistracy<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator align=”align_left”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 26 of 13 March 2023 on the candidacy of Alexandru POSTICA, candidate for the Superior Council of Magistracy<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator align=”align_left”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 25 of 10 March 2023 on the candidacy of Ion GUZUN, candidate for the Superior Council of Magistracy<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator align=”align_left”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 24 of 10 March 2023 on the candidacy of Tatiana CIAGLIC, candidate for the Superior Council of Magistracy<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator align=”align_left”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 1 of 14 February 2023 on the candidacy of Ludmila OU\u0218, candidate to the Superior Council of Magistracy<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator align=”align_left”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 1 of 7 February 2023 on the candidacy of Vasile STOINOV, candidate for the Superior Council of Prosecutors<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator align=”align_left”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

DISSENTING OPINON submitted by member Vitalie Miron, concerning the decision no. 21, regarding the evaluation of the magistrate Alexei PANI\u0218, candidate for the position of member of the Superior Council of the Magistracy, adopted by the Commission on 24.01.2023<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator align=”align_left”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 21 of 24 January 2023 on the candidacy of Alexei PANIS, candidate for the Superior Council of Magistracy<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator align=”align_left”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

DISSENTING OPINON submitted by member Vitalie Miron, concerning the decision no. 22, regarding the evaluation of the magistrate Marina RUSU, candidate for the position of member of the Superior Council of the Magistracy, adopted by the Commission on 27.01.2023<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator align=”align_left”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 22 of 27 January 2023 on the candidacy of Marina RUSU, candidate for the Superior Council of Magistracy<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator align=”align_left”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

DISSENTING OPINON submitted by member Vitalie Miron, concerning the decision no. 19, regarding the evaluation of the magistrate Ion CHIRTOAC\u0102, candidate for the position of member of the Superior Council of the Magistracy, adopted by the Commission on 20.01.2023<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator align=”align_left”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 19 of 20 January 2023 on the candidacy of Ion CHIRTOAC\u0102 for the Superior Council of Magistracy<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator align=”align_left”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 20 of 23 January 2023 on the candidacy of Natalia CLEVAD\u00ce, candidate for the Superior Council of Magistracy<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator align=”align_left”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 17 of 18 January 2023 on the candidacy of Stanislav SORBALO, candidate for the Superior Council of Magistracy and the Disciplinary Board of Judges<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator align=”align_left”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 15 of 11 January 2023 on the candidacy of Aliona MIRON, candidate for the Superior Council of Magistracy<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator align=”align_left”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 14 of 11 January 2023 on the candidacy of Veronica CUPCEA, candidate for the Superior Council of Magistracy, the Board for the selection and career of judges and the Board for the evaluation of the performance of judges<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator align=”align_left”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 2 of 11 January 2023 on the candidacy of Ilie M\u0102M\u0102LIG\u0102, candidate for the Superior Council of Magistracy<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator align=”align_left”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 1 of 11 January 2023 on the candidacy of Evgheni FLOREA, candidate for the Superior Council of Magistracy<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator align=”align_left”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 11 of 5 January 2023 on the candidacy of Vasile SCHIOPU, candidate for the Superior Council of Magistracy<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator align=”align_left”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 1 of 4 January 2023 on the candidacy of Feodor BRIA, candidate to the Superior Council of Magistracy<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator align=”align_left”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 10 of 4 January 2023 on the candidacy of Ecaterina BUZU, candidate for the Superior Council of Magistracy<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator align=”align_left”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 9 of 29 December 2022 on the candidacy of Sergiu CARAMAN, candidate for the Superior Council of Magistracy and for the Board for Performance Evaluation of Judges<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator align=”align_left”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

DISSENTING OPINON submitted by member Vitalie Miron, concerning the decision no. 6, regarding the evaluation of the magistrate Angela Bostan, candidate for the position of member of the Superior Council of the Magistracy, adopted by the Commission on 09.12.2022<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator align=”align_left”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 6 of 9 December 2022 on the candidacy of Angela BOSTAN, candidate for the Superior Council of Magistracy<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator align=”align_left”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 4 of 9 December 2022 on the candidacy of Iurie BEJENARU, candidate for the Superior Council of Magistracy<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator align=”align_left”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 3 of 26 October 2022 on the candidacy of Ioana CHIRONE\u021a, candidate for the Superior Council of Magistracy<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator align=”align_left”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 2 of 25 October 2022 on the candidacy of Maria FRUNZE, candidate for the Superior Council of Magistracy and for the Board for the Selection and Career of Judges<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator align=”align_left”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No.1 of 25 October 2022 on the candidacy of Livia MITROFAN, candidate for the Superior Council of Magistracy<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator align=”align_left”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 1 of 23 September 2022 on the candidacy of judge Iana TALMACI to the Superior Council of Magistracy<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator align=”align_left”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 1 of 12 September 2022 on the candidacy of judge Dumitru PU\u0218CA to the Superior Council of Magistracy<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator align=”align_left”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 1 of 21 July 2022 on the candidacy of judge Gheorghe BALAN, candidate for the Superior Council of Magistracy, the Board for the Selection and Career of Judges, the Board for the Evaluation of the Performance of Judges and the Disciplinary Board<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator align=”align_left”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 1 of 11 July 2022 on the candidacy of judge Mihail COJOCARU to the Superior Council of Magistracy and Disciplinary Board<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[\/vc_tab][vc_tab show_icon=”yes” title=”Resumed evaluation decisions” tab_id=”eeb2e989-650c-6″ icon=”fas fa-file-alt”]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 19 of 11 February 2025 on the Second Resumed Evaluation of Ecaterina BUZU, Candidate for the Superior Council of Magistracy<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 16 of 28 June 2024 on the Resumed Evaluation of Alexei PANI\u0218, candidate for the Superior Council of Magistracy<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 14 of 28 May 2024 on the Resumed Evaluation of Veronica CUPCEA, candidate for the Superior Council of Magistracy and the Board for the selection and evaluation of judges<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 13 of 21 May 2024 on the Resumed Evaluation of Ion CHIRTOAC\u0102, candidate for the Superior Council of Magistracy<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 11 of 11 MApril 2024 on the Resumed Evaluation of Aureliu POSTIC\u0102, candidate for the Superior Council of Magistracy<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 10 of 12 March 2024 on the Resumed Evaluation of Nicolae \u0218OVA, candidate for the Superior Council of Magistracy<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 8 of 30 January 2024 on the Resumed Evaluation of Ecaterina BUZU, candidate to the Superior Council of Magistracy<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 1 of 19 January 2024 on the candidacy of Stanislav SORBALO, candidate to the Superior Council of Magistracy and the Disciplinary Board of Judges<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 6 of 29 December 2023 on the resumed evaluation of Tatiana CHIRIAC, candidate for the Superior Council of Magistracy<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 5 of 21 December 2023 on the resumed evaluation of Angela BOSTAN, candidate for the Superior Council of Magistracy<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 1 of 28 December 2023 on the candidacy of Valentin CAIS\u00ceN, candidate for the Superior Council of Magistracy<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 4 of 6 December 2023 on the resumed evaluation of Aliona MIRON, candidate for the Superior Council of Magistracy<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[vc_separator]

\"\"<\/div><\/div>

Decision No. 1 of 30 November 2023 on the candidacy of Angela POPIL, candidate for the Superior Council of Magistracy<\/h3>

Download<\/p><\/div> <\/div><\/a>[\/vc_tab][\/vc_tabs][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

[vc_row wrap_container=”yes” conditional_render=”%5B%7B%22value_role%22%3A%22administrator%22%7D%5D”][vc_column][vc_tabs position=”top-center” skin=”primary” type=”tabs-simple” icon_style=”featured-boxes-style-2″][vc_tab show_icon=”yes” title=”Decisions” tab_id=”a7ad52db-a6df-0″ icon=”fas fa-gavel”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-3978","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nDecisions - "Pre-Vetting" Commission<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/?page_id=3978&lang=en\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Decisions - "Pre-Vetting" Commission\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"[vc_row wrap_container=”yes” conditional_render=”%5B%7B%22value_role%22%3A%22administrator%22%7D%5D”][vc_column][vc_tabs position=”top-center” skin=”primary” type=”tabs-simple” icon_style=”featured-boxes-style-2″][vc_tab show_icon=”yes” title=”Decisions” tab_id=”a7ad52db-a6df-0″ icon=”fas fa-gavel”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/?page_id=3978&lang=en\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\""Pre-Vetting" Commission\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ComisiaPreVetting\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-11-28T14:04:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/logo-primary.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"178\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"187\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"12 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/?page_id=3978&lang=en\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/?page_id=3978&lang=en\",\"name\":\"Decisions - "Pre-Vetting" Commission\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2023-12-15T14:19:52+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-11-28T14:04:30+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/?page_id=3978&lang=en#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[[\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/?page_id=3978&lang=en\"]]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/?page_id=3978&lang=en#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/?lang=en\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Decizii\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en\",\"name\":\""Pre-Vetting" Commission\",\"description\":\"The independent commission for evaluating the integrity of candidates for the position of member in the self-administration bodies of judges and prosecutors\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en#organization\",\"name\":\""Pre-Vetting" Commission\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/logo-primary.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/logo-primary.png\",\"width\":178,\"height\":187,\"caption\":\""Pre-Vetting" Commission\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ComisiaPreVetting\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UC2EHBvtuq2H0EkeR38NCnKQ\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Decisions - "Pre-Vetting" Commission","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/?page_id=3978&lang=en","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Decisions - "Pre-Vetting" Commission","og_description":"[vc_row wrap_container=”yes” conditional_render=”%5B%7B%22value_role%22%3A%22administrator%22%7D%5D”][vc_column][vc_tabs position=”top-center” skin=”primary” type=”tabs-simple” icon_style=”featured-boxes-style-2″][vc_tab show_icon=”yes” title=”Decisions” tab_id=”a7ad52db-a6df-0″ icon=”fas fa-gavel”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator align=”align_left”][vc_separator […]","og_url":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/?page_id=3978&lang=en","og_site_name":""Pre-Vetting" Commission","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ComisiaPreVetting","article_modified_time":"2025-11-28T14:04:30+00:00","og_image":[{"width":178,"height":187,"url":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/logo-primary.png","type":"image\/png"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"12 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/?page_id=3978&lang=en","url":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/?page_id=3978&lang=en","name":"Decisions - "Pre-Vetting" Commission","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en#website"},"datePublished":"2023-12-15T14:19:52+00:00","dateModified":"2025-11-28T14:04:30+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/?page_id=3978&lang=en#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":[["https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/?page_id=3978&lang=en"]]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/?page_id=3978&lang=en#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/?lang=en"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Decizii"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en#website","url":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en","name":""Pre-Vetting" Commission","description":"The independent commission for evaluating the integrity of candidates for the position of member in the self-administration bodies of judges and prosecutors","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en#organization","name":""Pre-Vetting" Commission","url":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/logo-primary.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/logo-primary.png","width":178,"height":187,"caption":""Pre-Vetting" Commission"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ComisiaPreVetting","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UC2EHBvtuq2H0EkeR38NCnKQ"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en%2Findex.php&rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3978","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en%2Findex.php&rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en%2Findex.php&rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en%2Findex.php&rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en%2Findex.php&rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3978"}],"version-history":[{"count":203,"href":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en%2Findex.php&rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3978\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4920,"href":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en%2Findex.php&rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3978\/revisions\/4920"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en%2Findex.php&rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3978"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}