{"id":3430,"date":"2023-07-10T16:07:22","date_gmt":"2023-07-10T13:07:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/?page_id=3430"},"modified":"2025-08-14T10:02:26","modified_gmt":"2025-08-14T07:02:26","slug":"constestatii-csj","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/?page_id=3430&lang=en","title":{"rendered":"SCJ appeals"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>[vc_row][vc_column width=&#8221;1\/6&#8243;][\/vc_column][vc_column width=&#8221;2\/3&#8243; text_align=&#8221;center&#8221; conditional_render=&#8221;%5B%7B%22value_role%22%3A%22administrator%22%7D%5D&#8221;][vc_empty_space][vc_accordion active_tab=&#8221;false&#8221; collapsible=&#8221;yes&#8221;][vc_accordion_tab title=&#8221;Appeals of candidates to SCM \/ SCP&#8221;][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n<table class=\" alignleft\" style=\"height: 888px; width: 100%;\" width=\"100%\">\n<tbody>\n<tr style=\"height: 216px;\">\n<td style=\"height: 216px;\">\n<div><strong>No.<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 216px;\">\n<div><strong>Name\/Surname\/position<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 216px;\">\n<div><strong>Decision of the Pre-Vetting Commission<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 216px;\">\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Decision of the Supreme Court of Justice\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Source: www.csj.md<\/p>\n<p>unofficial translation<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 216px;\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<div><strong>&#8211;<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">BEJENARU Iurie, judge<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/Decision-BEJENARU-redacted.pdf\">Failing decision<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/SCJ-Decision_Bejenaru_Final_ENG.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Upheld the Commission decision<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<div><strong>&#8211;<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">BOSTAN Angela, judge<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/Decision-BOSTAN-redacted.pdf\">Failing decision<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/SCJ_Decision_Bostan_Final_ENG.pdf\">Ordered re-evaluation<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<div><strong>&#8211;<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">BU\u0218ULEAC Mihail, judge<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\">Refused the publication of the failing decision<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/SCJ_Decision_Busuleac_Final_ENG.pdf\">Ordered re-evaluation<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<div><strong>&#8211;<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">BUZU Ecaterina, judge<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/Decision-BUZU_redacted.pdf\">Failing decision<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/SCJ_Decision_Buzu_ENG.pdf\">Ordered re-evaluation<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<div><strong>&#8211;<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">CAIS\u00ceN Valentin, non-judge<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Decision-CAISIN.pdf\">Failing decision<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/SCJ_Decision_Caisin_ENG.pdf\">Ordered re-evaluation<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<div><strong>&#8211;<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">CHIRIAC Tatiana, non-judge<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Decision-CHIRIAC.pdf\">Failing decision<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/SCJ_Decision_Chiriac_Final_ENG.pdf\">Ordered re-evaluation<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<div><strong>&#8211;<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">CHIRTOAC\u0102 Ion, judge<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/Decision-CHIRTOACA.pdf\">Failing decision<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/SCJ_Decision_Chirtoaca_Final_ENG.pdf\">Ordered re-evaluation<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<div><strong>&#8211;<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">CLEVAD\u00ce Natalia, judge<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/Decision-CLEVADI.pdf\">Failing decision<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\">\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/CSJ-Decizie-CLEVADI.pdf\">Upheld the Commission decision (RO)<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<div><strong>&#8211;<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">CODREANU Vitalie, prosecutor<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\">Refused the publication of the failing decision<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/SCJ_Decision_Codreanu_Final_ENG.pdf\">Ordered re-evaluation<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<div><strong>&#8211;<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">CUPCEA Veronica, judge<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/Decision-CUPCEA.pdf\">Failing decision<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/SCJ_Decision_Cupcea_Final_ENG.pdf\">Ordered re-evaluation<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<div><strong>&#8211;<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">GLADCOV\u00a0 Cristina, prosecutor<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\">Refused the publication of the failing decision<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/SCJ_Decision_Gladcov_FInal_ENG.pdf\">Ordered re-evaluation<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<div><strong>&#8211;<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">G\u00ceRBU Anatolie, prosecutor<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\">Refused the publication of the failing decision<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/SCJ_Decision_Girbu_Final_ENG.pdf\">Ordered re-evaluation<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<div><strong>&#8211;<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">GRAUR\u00a0 Gheorghe, prosecutor<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\">Refused the publication of the failing decision<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/SCJ_Decision_Graur_Final_ENG.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Upheld the Commission decision <\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<div><strong>&#8211;<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">HOLBAN Vladislav, judge<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\">Refused the publication of the failing decision<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/SCJ_Decision_Holban_Final_ENG.pdf\">Ordered re-evaluation<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<div><strong>&#8211;<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">MIRON Aliona, judge<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/Decision-MIRON.pdf\">Failing decision<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/SCJ_Decision_Miron_Final_ENG.pdf\">Ordered re-evaluation<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<div><strong>&#8211;<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">OSOIANU Sergiu, judge<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\">Refused the publication of the failing decision<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/SCJ_Decision_Osoianu_Final_ENG.pdf\">Ordered re-evaluation<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<div><strong>&#8211;<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">PANI\u0218 Alexei, judge<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/Decision-PANIS.pdf\">Failing decision<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/SCJ_Decision_Panis_Final_ENG.pdf\">Ordered re-evaluation<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<div><strong>&#8211;<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">PLEVAN Vasile, prosecutor<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/Decision-PLEVAN-Redacted.pdf\">Failing decision<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/CSJ-Decizie-PLEVAN.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Upheld the Commission decision (RO)<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<div><strong>&#8211;<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">POPIL Angela, non-judge<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Decision-POPIL.pdf\">Failing decision<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/SCJ_Decisions_Popil_Final_ENG.pdf\">Ordered re-evaluation<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<div><strong>&#8211;<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">POSTIC\u0102 Aureliu, judge<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\">Refused the publication of the failing decision<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/SCJ_Decision_Postica_Final_ENG.pdf\">Ordered re-evaluation<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<div><strong>&#8211;<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">ROTARI Alexandru, non-judge<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\">Refused the publication of the failing decision<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/SCJ_Decision_Rotari_Final_ENG.pdf\">Ordered re-evaluation<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<div><strong>&#8211;<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">RUSU Marina, judge<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/Decision-RUSU.pdf\">Failing decision<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/CSJ_decizie_Marina_Rusu.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Ordered re-evaluation<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<div><strong>&#8211;<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">SANDU Victor, judge<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\">Refused the publication of the failing decision<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/SCJ_Decision_Sandu_Final_ENG.pdf\">Ordered re-evaluation<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<div><strong>&#8211;<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">SORBALO Stanislav, judge<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/Decision-SORBALO.pdf\">Failing decision<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/SCJ_Decision_Sorbalo_Final_ENG.pdf\">Ordered re-evaluation<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<div><strong>&#8211;<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">STRATAN Vitalie, judge<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\">Refused the publication of the failing decision<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/SCJ_Decision_Stratan_Final_ENG.pdf\">Ordered re-evaluation<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<div><strong>&#8211;<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">\u0218OVA Nicolae, judge<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\">Refused the publication of the failing decision<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/SCJ_Decision_Sova_Final_ENG.pdf\">Ordered re-evaluation<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<div><strong> &#8211;<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">TIPA Ana, non-judge<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/Decision-TIPA.pdf\">Failing decision<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/SCJ_Decision_Tipa_Final_ENG.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Upheld the Commission decision<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<div><strong>&#8211;<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 24px;\">\u021aURCAN Anatolie, judge<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\">Refused the publication of the failing decision<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/CSJ-decizie-TURCAN.pdf\">Upheld the Commission decision (RO)<\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px;\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_accordion_tab][vc_accordion_tab title=&#8221;SCJ Appeals on resumed evaluation&#8221;][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<table class=\" alignleft\" style=\"height: 442px; width: 100%;\" width=\"100%\">\n<tbody>\n<tr style=\"height: 216px;\">\n<td style=\"height: 10px; text-align: center; width: 3.43699%;\">\n<div><strong>No.<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 10px; text-align: center; width: 24.1408%;\">\n<div><strong>Name\/Surname\/position<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 10px; text-align: center; width: 35.1064%;\">\n<div><strong>Decision of the Pre-Vetting Commission<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 10px; text-align: center; width: 36.1702%;\">\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Decision of the Supreme Court of Justice\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Source: www.csj.md<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 10px; width: 0.327332%;\">\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<td style=\"height: 24px; text-align: center; width: 3.43699%;\">\n<div><strong>&#8211;<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 24px; width: 24.1408%;\">BOSTAN Angela, judge<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 24px; text-align: center; width: 35.1064%;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\"><a style=\"color: #000080;\" href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/ResEval-Decision_A.Bostan.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Failing Decision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 24px; text-align: center; width: 36.1702%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Bostan_Decizie_CSJ_2.pdf\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\">Upheld the Commission<span style=\"color: #000080;\">&#8216;s Deci<\/span>sion <span style=\"font-family: inherit; font-size: inherit;\">on the resumed evaluation (RO)<\/span><\/span><\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px; width: 0.327332%;\">\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<td style=\"height: 24px; text-align: center; width: 3.43699%;\">\n<div><strong>&#8211;<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 24px; width: 24.1408%;\">CHIRIAC Tatiana, non-judge<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 24px; text-align: center; width: 35.1064%;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\"><a style=\"color: #000080;\" href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/ResEval-Decision_T.Chiriac.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Failing Decision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 24px; text-align: center; width: 36.1702%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chiriac_Decizie_CSJ_2.pdf\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\">Upheld the Commission&#8217;s Decision<span style=\"color: #000080;\">\u00a0<\/span>on the resumed evaluation (RO)<\/span><\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px; width: 0.327332%;\">\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<td style=\"height: 24px; text-align: center; width: 3.43699%;\">\n<div><strong>&#8211;<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 24px; width: 24.1408%;\">CODREANU Vitalie, prosecutor<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px; width: 35.1064%;\">Refused the publication of the failing decision<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px; width: 36.1702%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Codreanu_Decizie_CSJ_2.pdf\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\">Upheld the Commission Decision\u00a0on the resumed evaluation (RO)<\/span><\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px; width: 0.327332%;\">\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<td style=\"height: 24px; text-align: center; width: 3.43699%;\">\n<div><strong>&#8211;<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 24px; width: 24.1408%;\">GLADCOV Cristina, prosecutor<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px; width: 35.1064%;\">Refused the publication of the failing decision<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px; width: 36.1702%;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\"><a style=\"color: #000080;\" href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/Gladcov_Decizie_CSJ_2.pdf\">Upheld the Commission&#8217;s Decision\u00a0on the resumed evaluation (RO)<\/a><\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px; width: 0.327332%;\">\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<td style=\"height: 24px; text-align: center; width: 3.43699%;\">\n<div><strong>&#8211;<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 24px; width: 24.1408%;\">G\u00ceRBU Anatolie, prosecutor<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px; width: 35.1064%;\">Refused the publication of the failing decision<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px; width: 36.1702%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Girbu_Decizie_CSJ_2.pdf\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\">Upheld the Commission&#8217;s Decision\u00a0on the resumed evaluation (RO)<\/span><\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px; width: 0.327332%;\">\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<td style=\"height: 24px; text-align: center; width: 3.43699%;\">\n<div><strong>&#8211;<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 24px; width: 24.1408%;\">ROTARI Alexandru, non-judge<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px; width: 35.1064%;\">Refused the publication of the failing decision<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px; width: 36.1702%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Rotari_Decizie_CSJ_2.pdf\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\">Upheld the Commission&#8217;s Decision\u00a0on the resumed evaluation (RO)<\/span><\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; height: 24px; width: 0.327332%;\">\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: center; width: 3.43699%; height: 24px;\">\n<div><strong>&#8211;<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 24.1408%; height: 24px;\">SORBALO Stanislav, former judge<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; width: 35.1064%; height: 24px;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\"><a style=\"color: #000080;\" href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Decision-termination-evaluation-S.Sorbalo.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Decision on termination of evaluation<\/a><\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; width: 36.1702%; height: 24px;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\"><a style=\"color: #000080;\" href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Sorbalo_Decizie_CSJ_2.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Upheld the Commission&#8217;s Decision (RO)<\/a><\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; width: 0.327332%; height: 24px;\">\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: center; width: 3.43699%; height: 24px;\">\n<div><strong>&#8211;<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 24.1408%; height: 24px;\">BUZU Ecaterina, judge<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; width: 35.1064%; height: 24px;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\"><a style=\"color: #000080;\" href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/ResEval-Decision_E.Buzu_.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Failing Decision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; width: 36.1702%; height: 24px;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\"><a style=\"color: #000080;\" href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Buzu_Decizie_CSJ_2.pdf\">Ordered reevaluation (RO)<\/a><\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; width: 0.327332%; height: 24px;\">\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: center; width: 3.43699%; height: 24px;\">\n<div><strong>&#8211;<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 24.1408%; height: 24px;\">STRATAN Vitalie, judge<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; width: 35.1064%; height: 24px;\">Refused the publication of the failing decision<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; width: 36.1702%; height: 24px;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\"><a style=\"color: #000080;\" href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Stratan_Decizie_CSJ_2.pdf\">Upheld the Commission&#8217;s Decision\u00a0on the resumed evaluation (RO)<\/a><\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; width: 0.327332%; height: 24px;\">\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: center; width: 3.43699%; height: 24px;\">\n<div><strong>&#8211;<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 24.1408%; height: 24px;\">\u0218OVA Nicolae, judge<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; width: 35.1064%; height: 24px;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\"><a style=\"color: #000080;\" href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/ResEval-Decision_N.Sova_.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Failing Decision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; width: 36.1702%; height: 24px;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\"><a style=\"color: #000080;\" href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Sova_Decizie_CSJ_2.pdf\">Upheld the Commission&#8217;s Decision on the resumed evaluation (RO)<\/a><\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; width: 0.327332%; height: 24px;\">\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: center; width: 3.43699%; height: 24px;\">\n<div><strong>&#8211;<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 24.1408%; height: 24px;\">POSTIC\u0102 Aureliu, judge<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; width: 35.1064%; height: 24px;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\"><a style=\"color: #000080;\" href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/ResEval-Decision_A.Postica.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Failing Decision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; width: 36.1702%; height: 24px;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\"><a style=\"color: #000080;\" href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Postica_Decizie_CSJ_2.pdf\">Upheld the Commission&#8217;s Decision on the resumed evaluation (RO)<\/a><\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; width: 0.327332%; height: 24px;\">\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: center; width: 3.43699%; height: 24px;\">\n<div><strong>&#8211;<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 24.1408%; height: 24px;\">OSOIANU Sergiu, judge<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; width: 35.1064%; height: 24px;\">Refused the publication of the failing decision<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; width: 36.1702%; height: 24px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/Osoianu_Decizie_CSJ_2.pdf\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\">Upheld the Commission&#8217;s Decision on the resumed evaluation (RO)<\/span><\/a><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; width: 0.327332%; height: 24px;\">\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: center; width: 3.43699%; height: 24px;\">\n<div><strong>&#8211;<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 24.1408%; height: 24px;\">CHIRTOAC\u0102 Ion, judge<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; width: 35.1064%; height: 24px;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\"><a style=\"color: #000080;\" href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/ResEval-Decision_I.Chritoaca-1.pdf\">Failing Decision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; width: 36.1702%; height: 24px;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\"><a style=\"color: #000080;\" href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Chirtoaca_Decizie_CSJ_2.pdf\">Annulled the Commission&#8217;s decision and promoted the candidate (RO)<\/a><\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; width: 0.327332%; height: 24px;\">\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: center; width: 3.43699%; height: 24px;\">\n<div><strong>&#8211;<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 24.1408%; height: 24px;\">CUPCEA Veronica, judge<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; width: 35.1064%; height: 24px;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\"><a style=\"color: #000080;\" href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/ResEval-Decision_V.Cupcea.pdf\">Failing Decision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; width: 36.1702%; height: 24px;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\"><a style=\"color: #000080;\" href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Cupcea_Decizie_CSJ_2.pdf\">Upheld the Commission&#8217;s Decision on the resumed evaluation (RO)<\/a><\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; width: 0.327332%; height: 24px;\">\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: center; width: 3.43699%; height: 24px;\">\n<div><strong>&#8211;<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 24.1408%; height: 24px;\">HOLBAN Vladislav, judge<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; width: 35.1064%; height: 24px;\">Refused the publication of the failing decision<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; width: 36.1702%; height: 24px;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\"><a style=\"color: #000080;\" href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Holban_Decizie_CSJ_2.pdf\">Upheld the Commission&#8217;s Decision on the resumed evaluation (RO)<\/a><\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; width: 0.327332%; height: 24px;\">\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: center; width: 3.43699%; height: 24px;\">\n<div><strong>&#8211;<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 24.1408%; height: 24px;\">PANI\u0218 Alexei, judge<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; width: 35.1064%; height: 24px;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\"><a style=\"color: #000080;\" href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/ResEval-Decision_A.Panis_.pdf\">Failing Decision<\/a><\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; width: 36.1702%; height: 24px;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\"><a style=\"color: #000080;\" href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Panis_Decizie_CSJ_2.pdf\">Upheld the Commission&#8217;s Decision on the resumed evaluation (RO)<\/a><\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; width: 0.327332%; height: 24px;\">\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: center; width: 3.43699%; height: 24px;\">\n<div><strong>&#8211;<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 24.1408%; height: 24px;\">RUSU Marina, judge<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; width: 35.1064%; height: 24px;\">Refused the publication of the failing decision<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; width: 36.1702%; height: 24px;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\">&#8211;<\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; width: 0.327332%; height: 24px;\">\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 24px;\">\n<td style=\"text-align: center; width: 3.43699%; height: 24px;\">\n<div><strong>&#8211;<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 24.1408%; height: 24px;\">SANDU Victor, judge<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; width: 35.1064%; height: 24px;\">Refused the publication of the failing decision<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; width: 36.1702%; height: 24px;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\"><a style=\"color: #000080;\" href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Sandu_Decizie_CSJ-2.pdf\">Upheld the Commission&#8217;s Decision on the resumed evaluation (RO)<\/a><\/span><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center; width: 0.327332%; height: 24px;\">\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_accordion_tab][\/vc_accordion][\/vc_column][vc_column width=&#8221;1\/6&#8243;][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text][\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>[vc_row][vc_column width=&#8221;1\/6&#8243;][\/vc_column][vc_column width=&#8221;2\/3&#8243; text_align=&#8221;center&#8221; conditional_render=&#8221;%5B%7B%22value_role%22%3A%22administrator%22%7D%5D&#8221;][vc_empty_space][vc_accordion active_tab=&#8221;false&#8221; collapsible=&#8221;yes&#8221;][vc_accordion_tab title=&#8221;Appeals of candidates to SCM \/ SCP&#8221;][vc_column_text] No. Name\/Surname\/position Decision of the Pre-Vetting Commission &nbsp; &nbsp; Decision of the Supreme Court of Justice\u00a0 Source: www.csj.md unofficial translation &#8211; BEJENARU Iurie, judge Failing decision Upheld the Commission decision &#8211; BOSTAN Angela, judge Failing decision Ordered re-evaluation &#8211; BU\u0218ULEAC Mihail, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-3430","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v20.11 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>SCJ appeals - &quot;Pre-Vetting&quot; Commission<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/?page_id=3430&lang=en\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"SCJ appeals - &quot;Pre-Vetting&quot; Commission\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"[vc_row][vc_column width=&#8221;1\/6&#8243;][\/vc_column][vc_column width=&#8221;2\/3&#8243; text_align=&#8221;center&#8221; conditional_render=&#8221;%5B%7B%22value_role%22%3A%22administrator%22%7D%5D&#8221;][vc_empty_space][vc_accordion active_tab=&#8221;false&#8221; collapsible=&#8221;yes&#8221;][vc_accordion_tab title=&#8221;Appeals of candidates to SCM \/ SCP&#8221;][vc_column_text] No. Name\/Surname\/position Decision of the Pre-Vetting Commission &nbsp; &nbsp; Decision of the Supreme Court of Justice\u00a0 Source: www.csj.md unofficial translation &#8211; BEJENARU Iurie, judge Failing decision Upheld the Commission decision &#8211; BOSTAN Angela, judge Failing decision Ordered re-evaluation &#8211; BU\u0218ULEAC Mihail, [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/?page_id=3430&amp;lang=en\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"&quot;Pre-Vetting&quot; Commission\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ComisiaPreVetting\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-08-14T07:02:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/logo-primary.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"178\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"187\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/?page_id=3430&lang=en\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/?page_id=3430&lang=en\",\"name\":\"SCJ appeals - &quot;Pre-Vetting&quot; Commission\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2023-07-10T13:07:22+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-08-14T07:02:26+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/?page_id=3430&lang=en#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[[\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/?page_id=3430&lang=en\"]]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/?page_id=3430&lang=en#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/?lang=en\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Constesta\u021bii CSJ\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en\",\"name\":\"&quot;Pre-Vetting&quot; Commission\",\"description\":\"The independent commission for evaluating the integrity of candidates for the position of member in the self-administration bodies of judges and prosecutors\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en#organization\",\"name\":\"&quot;Pre-Vetting&quot; Commission\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/logo-primary.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/logo-primary.png\",\"width\":178,\"height\":187,\"caption\":\"&quot;Pre-Vetting&quot; Commission\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ComisiaPreVetting\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UC2EHBvtuq2H0EkeR38NCnKQ\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SCJ appeals - &quot;Pre-Vetting&quot; Commission","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/?page_id=3430&lang=en","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"SCJ appeals - &quot;Pre-Vetting&quot; Commission","og_description":"[vc_row][vc_column width=&#8221;1\/6&#8243;][\/vc_column][vc_column width=&#8221;2\/3&#8243; text_align=&#8221;center&#8221; conditional_render=&#8221;%5B%7B%22value_role%22%3A%22administrator%22%7D%5D&#8221;][vc_empty_space][vc_accordion active_tab=&#8221;false&#8221; collapsible=&#8221;yes&#8221;][vc_accordion_tab title=&#8221;Appeals of candidates to SCM \/ SCP&#8221;][vc_column_text] No. Name\/Surname\/position Decision of the Pre-Vetting Commission &nbsp; &nbsp; Decision of the Supreme Court of Justice\u00a0 Source: www.csj.md unofficial translation &#8211; BEJENARU Iurie, judge Failing decision Upheld the Commission decision &#8211; BOSTAN Angela, judge Failing decision Ordered re-evaluation &#8211; BU\u0218ULEAC Mihail, [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/?page_id=3430&lang=en","og_site_name":"&quot;Pre-Vetting&quot; Commission","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ComisiaPreVetting","article_modified_time":"2025-08-14T07:02:26+00:00","og_image":[{"width":178,"height":187,"url":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/logo-primary.png","type":"image\/png"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/?page_id=3430&lang=en","url":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/?page_id=3430&lang=en","name":"SCJ appeals - &quot;Pre-Vetting&quot; Commission","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en#website"},"datePublished":"2023-07-10T13:07:22+00:00","dateModified":"2025-08-14T07:02:26+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/?page_id=3430&lang=en#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":[["https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/?page_id=3430&lang=en"]]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/?page_id=3430&lang=en#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/?lang=en"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Constesta\u021bii CSJ"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en#website","url":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en","name":"&quot;Pre-Vetting&quot; Commission","description":"The independent commission for evaluating the integrity of candidates for the position of member in the self-administration bodies of judges and prosecutors","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en#organization","name":"&quot;Pre-Vetting&quot; Commission","url":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/logo-primary.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/logo-primary.png","width":178,"height":187,"caption":"&quot;Pre-Vetting&quot; Commission"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ComisiaPreVetting","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UC2EHBvtuq2H0EkeR38NCnKQ"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en%2Findex.php&rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3430","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en%2Findex.php&rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en%2Findex.php&rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en%2Findex.php&rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en%2Findex.php&rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3430"}],"version-history":[{"count":169,"href":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en%2Findex.php&rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3430\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4706,"href":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en%2Findex.php&rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3430\/revisions\/4706"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/vetting.md\/prevetting?lang=en%2Findex.php&rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3430"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}